Check the Blueprint
Start from the accepted research question, constructs, hypotheses, and constraints.
Methodology
Translate your accepted research question into a defensible methodology plan: design, sample, recruitment, measures, procedure, data collection, and analysis.
Why it helps
Students often know their topic before they can defend how they will study it. Scitong keeps the methodology tied to accepted Blueprint fields, so design, sample, measures, procedure, and analysis are not planned in isolation.
Open decisions stay visible. If the sample is uncertain, an instrument is missing, or the analysis does not match the question yet, the planner treats that as something to resolve before moving forward.
Start from the accepted research question, constructs, hypotheses, and constraints.
Clarify whether the thesis needs a survey, experiment, interview, case study, or other approach.
Record sample, recruitment, instruments, procedure, and data collection requirements.
Connect the method to the later analysis plan so results can answer the research question.
Method fit
A methodology is defensible when the method can actually answer the research question. The choice should follow from the question type, the kind of evidence needed, what data you can access, and the rules of your programme.
Useful when the question asks about relationships between measurable constructs across a defined group.
Useful when the thesis compares conditions and asks whether a controlled change affects an outcome.
Useful when the question asks how people interpret, experience, or make sense of a situation.
Useful when the project studies a bounded organisation, project, event, policy, or programme in context.
Useful when reliable existing datasets or documents can answer the question without new data collection.
Useful when the thesis needs both measurement and explanation, and the scope is still realistic.
How does perceived influencer credibility relate to purchase intention among Dutch undergraduate students?
A quantitative survey can fit if the thesis measures influencer credibility and purchase intention with defined scales and tests the relationship between them.
The method does not prove causality unless the design manipulates credibility or exposure. If the claim is causal, an experiment may be more defensible.
This study uses a cross-sectional survey to examine the association between perceived influencer credibility and purchase intention. The design supports relationship testing, while causal conclusions remain outside the scope of the study.
| Decision | What to write down | Common mistake |
|---|---|---|
| Design type | Name the design and explain why it fits the question, not only what the method is called. | Choosing a survey, interview, or experiment because it feels familiar rather than because it answers the question. |
| Sample | Define who belongs in the study, how participants or cases will be found, and what limits the sample. | Writing a broad population claim while only having access to a narrow convenience sample. |
| Measures or materials | List scales, interview topics, documents, stimuli, or datasets and connect each one to a construct. | Adding interesting questions or variables that are not needed to answer the research question. |
| Procedure | Describe the order in which participants, cases, or documents are handled. | Skipping practical details that affect reliability, consent, or interpretation. |
| Analysis plan | Explain how the collected data will be analysed and how that analysis answers each question or hypothesis. | Planning analysis after collection, when the data may not support the intended test or comparison. |
It helps you compare the method implied by your question, constructs, data access, and programme requirements.
The planner is structured around thesis decisions, so qualitative and mixed designs can still be recorded and reviewed.
Scitong can prepare a reviewable methodology draft from accepted Blueprint fields, but you remain responsible for editing and accepting it.