Draft clearly
New sections and fields start as draft or unreviewed work.
Integrity and review
Academic Integrity Thesis Tool
Keep your thesis workflow reviewable with draft states, accepted fields, evidence gaps, provenance, supervisor questions, and submission checks.
Why it helps
Integrity is easier when the workflow makes review visible
Scitong is not built around invisible one-click completion. It separates drafted material from reviewed work, keeps accepted fields explicit, and shows where claims still need evidence or supervisor confirmation.
That matters because thesis quality depends on ownership. The student reviews, edits, accepts, and carries each decision forward through the project.
- Visible review status for thesis sections and structured fields
- Evidence gaps shown before they become final claims
- Stage gates based on accepted project information
- Final submission review for completeness and consistency
Integrity workflow
Review fields
Edit, accept, or reopen Blueprint fields as the thesis becomes clearer.
Track gaps
Keep missing evidence, uncertain sources, and supervisor questions visible.
Check submission
Confirm chapters, results, and programme requirements before hand-in.
Common questions
Does this guarantee academic approval?
No tool can guarantee approval. Scitong helps students keep review, evidence, and thesis decisions visible.
Can I export my work?
The product includes submission-package thinking, with reviewed project material and completeness checks.
Does Scitong mention authorship rules for me?
No. Disclosure and university policy remain the student's responsibility. Scitong focuses on traceable, reviewed thesis work.